Language:
PRODUCTS▾
Home Core Serverless Edition Why It’s Different CDS — Constitutional Screening STFL — Sovereign Transaction Finance Layer Defence 🏰 Verify Security All Gates
MORE▾
ASSURANCE
Execution Rights Capabilities Authoritative Sources Evidence Evidence Registry Fortress Baseline Adversarial Verification Machine Law Evolution
SOLUTIONS
Institutions Jurisdictions Due Diligence
RESOURCES
Facts Press Newsroom FAQ Machine Law — The Book Gate SDK Gamechangers The Sound of Machine Law
COMMERCIAL
Pricing Investors
Quantum Security 🔍 Search Request Access →
gateEducationADM — One state never stands in for another.
// IMMO.QUICK · GATEEDUCATIONADM · LANDESHOCHSCHULGESETZE · 16 PARAMETER, KEINE ÜBERTRAGBARKEIT

One state never stands in for another.

gateEducationADM checks automated admission and assessment systems in education. Because education is a state matter in Germany, the gate requires an explicit state law parameter. If it is missing, the gate honestly returns pass with applicable: false, instead of silently assuming the wrong state.

Request Access → See the architecture
Test result: BLOCK. 2 of 2 test cases passed, missing human review on rejection leads to block.
✓ RELEVANT IF...
  • Your university or educational institution automatically decides on admission, grading, or allocation
× NOT RELEVANT IF...
  • No state law parameter is set, then the gate honestly does not check, instead of assuming the wrong state
// Architecture

Legal basis as hard flags.

Every row is a hard boolean check, not probabilistic scoring. A critical failure leads to block, a high severity failure to warn, everything else to pass.

ReferenceChecksSeverity
Art. 22 Abs. 3 DSGVOHuman review for every automated rejectioncritical
AGG, soweit anwendbarNo sensitive or proxy features in the admission modelcritical
LandeshochschulgesetzExplicit parameter, correctly set, no silent transferhigh
EU AI Act Anh. III Nr. 3Assessment criteria for automated grading documentedhigh
HMAC-signed GateLog record
Every run writes an HMAC-signed GateLog record with identity binding (caller_did, caller_role) and a ten-year retention period. Deterministic: identical input produces identical output, no LLM, no external API.
// Worked examples

Four inputs, four outcomes.

No example is hypothetical, each is an actual test case from the test suite report.

Example 1 · Nexus not met
No state law parameter set
PASS applicable: false
Without a state parameter the gate does not know which higher education act applies. It claims no check it cannot perform.
Example 2 · Critical, rejection without review
State parameter BWG_BW correctly set, but no human review on rejection, sensitive proxy features in the model
BLOCK 2 critical flags
The state law was correctly referenced, but the GDPR controls are missing. The gate blocks the automatic rejection.
// Clarification

What gateEducationADM is not.

  • Not a substantive review of the state law. The gate requires the explicit declaration of which law applies, it does not check its material correctness.

For educational institutions that want to provably bind automated admission and assessment systems to their respective state higher education act and GDPR Art. 22.

Request Access → access@immoquick.eu
Request Access →