Language:
PRODUCTS▾
Home Core Serverless Edition Why It’s Different CDS — Constitutional Screening STFL — Sovereign Transaction Finance Layer Defence 🏰 Verify Security All Gates
MORE▾
ASSURANCE
Execution Rights Capabilities Authoritative Sources Evidence Evidence Registry Fortress Baseline Adversarial Verification Machine Law Evolution
SOLUTIONS
Institutions Jurisdictions Due Diligence
RESOURCES
Facts Press Newsroom FAQ Machine Law — The Book Gate SDK Gamechangers The Sound of Machine Law
COMMERCIAL
Pricing Investors
Quantum Security 🔍 Search Request Access →
gateEmploymentADM — Recruiting blocks. Termination escalates to a human.
// IMMO.QUICK · GATEEMPLOYMENTADM · § 87 BETRVG · EU AI ACT ANHANG III NR. 4

Recruiting blocks. Termination escalates to a human.

gateEmploymentADM checks automated employment decisions, recruiting, evaluation, termination, for codetermination, freedom from discrimination, and human oversight. For recruiting, a critical violation leads to block. For termination, the same violation leads to MANDATORY_HUMAN_REVIEW, because a termination may never happen purely algorithmically.

Request Access → See the architecture
Test result: BLOCK. 3 of 3 test cases passed, recruiting blocks, termination escalates to MANDATORY_HUMAN_REVIEW.
✓ RELEVANT IF...
  • Your system automatically pre filters applicants, evaluates performance, or prepares terminations
× NOT RELEVANT IF...
  • A human makes the employment decision without an automated pre decision, then the gate honestly returns pass with applicable: false
// Architecture

Legal basis as hard flags.

Every row is a hard boolean check, not probabilistic scoring. A critical failure leads to block, a high severity failure to warn, everything else to pass.

ReferenceChecksSeverity
§ 87 Abs. 1 Nr. 6 BetrVGWorks council codetermination on monitoring systems, bound at the collective levelcritical
EU AI Act Anh. III Nr. 4, Art. 14Human oversight for high risk employment decisionscritical
AGGNo protected features or proxies without objective justificationcritical
Kündigung, SonderregelHuman confirmation before any termination, otherwise MANDATORY_HUMAN_REVIEW instead of blockcritical
RL (EU) 2024/2831Human oversight for algorithmic management of platform workhigh
HMAC-signed GateLog record
Every run writes an HMAC-signed GateLog record with identity binding (caller_did, caller_role) and a ten-year retention period. Deterministic: identical input produces identical output, no LLM, no external API.
// Worked examples

Four inputs, four outcomes.

No example is hypothetical, each is an actual test case from the test suite report.

Example 1 · Nexus not met
Employment decision not automated
PASS applicable: false
A human decides without an automated pre decision. Controls for automated systems do not apply.
Example 2 · Recruiting, critical → block
No works council involved, no human oversight, AGG protected features in the model
BLOCK 3 critical flags
An applicant can apply elsewhere, it is not an existentially threatening intervention. A block suffices: this recruiting system may not be used.
Example 3 · Termination, critical → MANDATORY_HUMAN_REVIEW
No works council involved, no human confirmation, AGG protected features in the model
MANDATORY_HUMAN_REVIEW 3 critical flags
An automatic block of a termination would itself be an automated intervention in the job. The gate forces human review before it is issued.
// Clarification

What gateEmploymentADM is not.

  • Not an individual right alone. Works council codetermination is a collective right, identity binding happens at company level, not the individual.

For companies that want to provably bind automated employment decisions to codetermination, anti discrimination law, and human oversight.

Request Access → access@immoquick.eu
Request Access →