gateFATF forensically seals that a cross-border transaction passes four clusters, due diligence, PEP screening, wire-transfer data, and high-risk jurisdiction review, as the global baseline beneath every national AML law such as the GwG or the BSA. Support for globally active institutions, never a replacement for national regulatory recognition.
The forty FATF recommendations are not law in the formal sense, but they are the template for the GwG, the BSA, and virtually every national anti-money-laundering law worldwide. gateFATF checks directly against this global standard, even where national implementation leaves gaps.
Every cluster is dispositive (material_block_mode: true), a hit blocks bindingly, not merely for documentation.
All values on this page are fictional test data and serve only to illustrate the gate logic.
| Scenario | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | Verdict | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wire transfer DE→SG, complete originator data, no high-risk jurisdiction, no PEP hit | PASS | PASS | PASS | PASS | FATF_SEALED | 372ms |
| Wire transfer to a FATF grey-list jurisdiction without enhanced measures | PASS | PASS | PASS | FAIL | BLOCK_FT4_HIGHRISK_JURISDICTION_NO_EDD | 355ms |