// IMMO.QUICK · GATEHIPAA · 45 CFR § 164 · HITECH

No PHI migration, without a business associate agreement.

gateHIPAA forensically seals that a Protected Health Information processing operation passes six clusters, administrative, physical, and technical safeguards, breach notification, the minimum-necessary rule, and a business associate agreement, before processing begins at T=0. Support for healthcare providers and their business associates, never a replacement for the DHHS's own recognition.

Request Access → See the architecture

In one sentence: gateHIPAA blocks any PHI processing where safeguards, encryption, or a business associate agreement are missing, before a single record moves.

✓ RELEVANT IF...

You process Protected Health Information (PHI) or store it as a business associate
You need to prove a PHI migration or cloud connection with complete safeguards

✕ NOT RELEVANT IF...

You expect the DHHS to automatically recognise the result as certification
No PHI processing or business associate relationship is involved

// The problem

A missing agreement makes the cloud provider an unauthorised recipient.

Without a valid business associate agreement, a service provider may not receive PHI at all. gateHIPAA checks all six safeguard clusters before even a single record leaves the source system.

// Architecture

6 clusters, checked sequentially.

Every cluster is dispositive (material_block_mode: true), a hit blocks bindingly, not merely for documentation.

CLUSTER 1

Administrative Safeguards

Checks the security management process, roles, and training under 45 CFR §164.308.

admin_safeguards_documented

CLUSTER 2

Physical Safeguards

Checks facility and workstation access controls under 45 CFR §164.310.

physical_safeguards_documented

CLUSTER 3

Technical Safeguards

Checks access control, audit logging, and transmission security under 45 CFR §164.312.

technical_safeguards_documented

CLUSTER 4

Breach Notification

Checks the sixty-day notification window under 45 CFR §164.404 and the HITECH enhancement.

breach_notification_hash · within_60_days

CLUSTER 5

Business Associate Agreement

Checks for a valid BAA under 45 CFR §164.502(e) and §164.314, before a service provider receives PHI.

baa_hash · baa_valid

CLUSTER 6

AES-256 Encryption

Checks at-rest encryption with AES-256 and documented key management under §164.312(a)(2)(iv).

encryption_hash · key_management_documented

// Test results

Two tested scenarios.

All values on this page are fictional test data and serve only to illustrate the gate logic.

Scenario	C1	C2	C3	C4	C5	C6	Verdict	Latency
Hospital cloud migration, all safeguards documented, BAA in place, AES-256 active	PASS	PASS	PASS	PASS	PASS	PASS	HIPAA_SEALED	455ms
Cloud migration without a business associate agreement	PASS	PASS	PASS	PASS	FAIL	not evaluated	BLOCK_HP5_NO_BAA	398ms

// Clarification

What gateHIPAA is not.

Not automatic recognition by the DHHS or the Office for Civil Rights. The gate delivers a cryptographic proof, not regulatory certification.
Not a replacement for an existing HIPAA compliance programme. The gate seals the release check, it does not replace a privacy impact assessment.

No PHI migration, without a business associate agreement.

A missing agreement makes the cloud provider an unauthorised recipient.

6 clusters, checked sequentially.

Two tested scenarios.

What gateHIPAA is not.

For healthcare providers and business associates that want to make PHI processing provable.