immo.quick — gateSport · VAR Forensic Decision Engine

// IMMO.QUICK · GATESPORT · VAR FORENSIC DECISION ENGINE

Sport Governance Forensic Engine · Deterministic · Not AI · No Probabilities

gateSport.

VAR Forensic Decision Engine · v2.1.0

The VAR problem is not a technology problem. It is an evidence problem.
Every referee decision — offside, foul, goal, penalty, red card — ends today as an opinion. Contestable. Unreproducible. Forensically worthless. gateSport ends them as proof.

Request Access → Live Decisions →

<750ms

40×

GATESPORT · VAR FORENSIC ENGINE · v2.1.0

RECEIPT  VAR-UEFA-UCL-2026-001
INCIDENT OFFSIDE_CHECK · UCL Final
TENANT  UEFA · 50mm override active
INPUT   offside_margin_mm: 43

ONSIDE

CLAUSE LAW_11_ONSIDE_CONFIRMED
MARGIN 43mm < 50mm UEFA threshold
CONFLICT UEFA 50mm ≠ FIFA 70mm · documented
PROC 426ms · HMAC-SHA256 · Merkle ✓

⚖ Forensic sport governance artifact · Not a subjective judgment · var-verify.immo.quick/receipt/

View all 3 live decisions →

// The Problem

TODAY — EVERY VAR DECISION

The verdict is produced without a chain of custody.

Subjective. Unreproducible. Legally unverifiable. Inconsistent across matches. Impossible to challenge with evidence. The VAR produces no record. It produces no proof. It does not say which rule was applied, which version of that rule was in force, which threshold was evaluated, or why the outcome was what it was.

AFTER GATESPORT — EVERY DECISION

The verdict is cryptographically sealed, Merkle-chained, and forensically admissible.

Deterministic. Reproducible. Independently verifiable. Consistent across all matches, all federations, all referees. Input hash, rule version hash, jurisdiction conflict documentation, complete gate log. Processing time: under 750 milliseconds. FIFA requirement for VAR display: 30 seconds. Headroom: 40x.

// Three real decisions. Three forensic receipts.

DECISION 01

UCL Final. Offside. 43mm.

ONSIDE

UEFA · 50mm override

TODAY

4 minutes. An opinion.

VAR operator draws a line on the screen. Discussion runs four minutes. Decision: onside or offside. Evidence: a screenshot of a VAR line that no one can verify was drawn correctly, against the right frame, under the right rule. Club protests. Protest rejected. No evidentiary basis.

AFTER GATESPORT

426ms. Proof.

verdict: "ONSIDE"
clause: "LAW_11_ONSIDE_CONFIRMED"
offside_margin_actual_mm: 43
technology_margin_mm: 50 (UEFA)
jurisdiction_conflict: "UEFA 50mm ≠ FIFA 70mm"
processing_ms: 426
payload_hash: SHA-256 of complete receipt
prev_receipt_hash: c3d9f1a2bb44...
hmac_signature: e52f7b6bba33...

Why this changes everything: Same player. Same 43mm. Different competition. At FIFA (70mm margin): ONSIDE. At UEFA (50mm margin): ONSIDE. What if the player is at 65mm? At FIFA: ONSIDE. Goal stands. At UEFA: OFFSIDE. Goal disallowed. Today you cannot prove which system was applied. From now on it is cryptographically documented in every single receipt — the exact rule version, the exact margin, the exact tenant.

DECISION 02

World Cup Quarterfinal. Goalkeeper left the line. Goal disallowed.

GOAL DISALLOWED

FIFA · P3 triggered

TODAY

6–8 minutes. Inconsistency.

Subjective reading of a single frame. Six to eight minutes of discussion. Decision varies by operator, by competition, by day. And then the procedural question nobody answers consistently: penalty retake or goal kick?

AFTER GATESPORT

481ms. Every time.

priority_check: P1 offside? NO → P2 foul? NO → P3 GK? YES
verdict: "GOAL_DISALLOWED"
clause: "LAW_10_GK_INFRINGEMENT_PENALTY_RETAKE"
consequence: "PENALTY_RETAKE" not GOAL_KICK
processing_ms: 481

Why this changes everything: There are documented cases where the same infringement produced different outcomes. Retake in one competition. Goal kick in another. Both decided by a human who remembered the rule differently. LAW_10_GK_INFRINGEMENT_PENALTY_RETAKE is now a clause in a sealed, versioned, HMAC-signed record. The rule is not what the VAR operator remembers. It is what rule_version_hash: 3441d8b8eef specifies. Permanently. Retrievably. Reproducibly.

DECISION 03

Premier League. Foul from behind. 0.94g. Red card. MANDATORY.

RED_CARD · MANDATORY

Premier League · Law 12

TODAY

Same action. Different card.

Referee A gives red. Referee B gives yellow. Same action. Same intensity. Different match. Different career consequences: five matches suspended or one. Evidence: video footage. Interpretable by anyone. Conclusive to no one.

AFTER GATESPORT

722ms. MANDATORY.

contact_intensity_g: 0.94
threshold foul_violent_min_g: 0.80
0.94 ≥ 0.80? YES
verdict: "RED_CARD"
clauses: ["LAW_12_SERIOUS_FOUL_PLAY", "LAW_5_RED_CARD_MANDATORY"]
processing_ms: 722

Why this changes everything: The word MANDATORY does not exist in football today. Every card is a 'referee's decision.' The 0.80g threshold is now internationally negotiable — on evidence. FIFA says 'violent conduct.' Fine. Now define it. Is it 0.80g? 0.75g? 0.85g? That number is technically measurable. Medically justifiable. Legally challengeable if set incorrectly. Transparent to every club worldwide. A player fouled at 0.94g given yellow can now present the receipt: input_hash, rule_version_hash, hmac_signature. Verdict: RED_CARD_MANDATORY.

// Integrity

Executive Override Firewall

AUTO_REJECTED

Scenario: A World Cup final kicks off tomorrow morning. A star player was suspended today following an automated red card. A federation official calls at 11 PM demanding an exception.

✕phone_call_override = trueCRITICAL

✕requested_by_role = "federation_official"not on whitelist

✕hours_before_next_match = 9<24h

✕legal_basis_claimed = ""empty

✕evidence_submitted = []no evidence

RESULT: AUTO_REJECTED (5 simultaneous reasons)
PUBLIC_RECORD: true (permanent, immutable)
POLITICAL_INTERFERENCE_DETECTED: true

The player does not play. The attempt at interference is not deleted and not negotiated — it is documented just as permanently as any other decision. Cryptographically sealed. Publicly verifiable.

Integrity Cluster — Betting Pattern Anomaly Detection

FLAG_RAISED

This cluster does not decide on match manipulation. It deterministically flags when hard-coded statistical thresholds are breached against the documented market baseline, and hands the case to a human integrity unit. Legal basis: FIFA Code of Ethics Art. 27, UEFA anti-match-fixing regulations, the Council of Europe Macolin Convention.

C1Odds movement anomalyvs. market baseline

C2Volume concentrationexotic bets

C3Geographic clusteringIP/provider cluster

C4Match-course correlationunlikely event

C5Cross-gate linkagegateTransfer, gateAntiDoping

RESULT: integrity_flag_raised: true (no match voided, no automatic ruling)
PATTERN_MATCHED: string
CROSS_GATE_HITS: []

The cluster does not decide. It delivers the sealed starting point. No AI probability scoring. Fixed comparison values against a documented baseline, forensically sealed, handed to the responsible integrity unit.

// Architecture

Input Hash

SHA-256 · canonical JSON · proves exact sensor readings

Rule Version Hash

SHA-256 · exact rulebook version · immutable reference

Jurisdiction Conflict

tenant override matrix · documents every deviation

Rule Engine

Law 5 · 10 · 11 · 12 · deterministic clauses

Receipt Assembly

complete gate log · all thresholds · all clauses

Payload Hash

SHA-256 of full receipt · tamper detection

HMAC-SHA256

receipt_id | payload_hash | timestamp · proves system produced this

Merkle Chain

SHA-256(payload:prev_hash) · detectable if any prior altered

Immutable DB

append-only · no deletion · permanent record

Forensic Receipt

complete · sealed · verifiable · <750ms total

// Integration — We do not replace. We seal.

SENSING LAYER

Hawk-Eye · Genius Sports · Operator

contact_intensity_g · offside_margin_mm · ball_crossing_mm · goalkeeper_infringement

→

GOVERNANCE LAYER

gateSport · VAR Forensic Engine

One API call. One receipt. 750 milliseconds. Forensic proof.

→

OUTPUT

Forensic Sport Receipt

HMAC-SHA256 · payload_hash · prev_receipt_hash · Merkle · CAS-admissible · evidentiary_grade: true

// Fairness and bias protection

Beyond contact detection: role, history, pattern, timing.

A physically correct contact measurement alone does not yet decide fairly who was the aggressor, whether a pattern exists across multiple incidents, and whether the score influenced the decision. Five additional gates close exactly that gap.

2.5

Contact Initiation

who initiated the contact — protects against a wrong verdict when the presumed aggressor was not the initiator

Simulation Score

biomechanical check against expected fall dynamics

Player History

documented prior record, not assumption

Team Tactical Fouls

systemic behaviour statistically detected across multiple incidents

Arm Trajectory

biomechanical motion analysis for handball decisions

Temporal Neutrality

match minute and score are deliberately excluded from the decision

＋

Operator Bias Analysis

statistical evaluation across VAR operator cohorts, not individual cases

＋

Post-Match Input Recheck

data quality rechecked after the match, result documented, not overwritten

// Procedural Integrity

The decision stays a factual ruling. The procedure does not.

This cluster does not assess the sporting correctness of a decision, that remains an untouchable factual ruling. It checks exclusively whether the prescribed procedural sequence under the IFAB Laws of the Game and the IFAB VAR Protocol was followed, as a standalone compliance attestation separate from the sporting outcome.

Category Eligibility

incident belongs to one of the four VAR-reviewable categories: goal, penalty, direct red card, mistaken identity

Silent Check Documentation

automatic silent check documented for every phase of play, even without subsequent communication

Communication Protocol

mandatory radio communication between VAR and referee, timestamped, once a check is triggered

Review Type Assignment

correct distinction between video review only (factual) and on-field review (subjective) at the review area

Timing Documentation

actual review duration against the IFAB promptness guidance, a forensic metric, not a sanction basis

var_protocol_compliant: true|false (tracked separately from the sporting decision)
A "false" changes nothing about the match result. It forensically documents a procedural error, relevant for internal association training and oversight purposes.

// Federations

FIFA

Fédération Internationale de Football Association

World Cup · Confed Cup

BASE RULES · No override

UEFA

Union of European Football Associations

UCL · UEL · UECL · EM

50mm offside · Shoulder handball

Premier_League

Premier League

England · PL

50mm offside · Upper arm handball

DFB / Bundesliga

DFB · DFL Deutsche Fußball Liga

Bundesliga · National team

Shoulder handball §12 DFB

CONMEBOL

South American Football Confederation

Copa Libertadores

BASE RULES

CAF

Confederation of African Football

Africa Cup

BASE RULES

AFC

Asian Football Confederation

Asian Cup

BASE RULES

+ MORE

Additional federations on request

Serie A · La Liga · Ligue 1 · MLS ...

Configurable

// What this means

FIFA AND UEFA

Governance through proof.

For the first time, you can prove your rules were applied consistently. Or identify exactly where they were not. That is not a threat. That is governance.

CLUBS AND PLAYERS

Challenge through evidence.

A suspension, a disallowed title, a transfer blocked by a disciplinary finding: all now challengeable with evidence, not appeals to video interpretation. The receipt is the argument.

CAS — COURT OF ARBITRATION FOR SPORT

Cases in days, not months.

Cases that currently run 18 months because the evidentiary record is a video file and two opposing subjective interpretations: they can close in days when the receipt is the record.

BROADCASTERS AND BETTING OPERATORS

Decision as data product.

A cryptographically sealed decision in under one second is not a subjective judgment. It is a forensically documented event. Explain the decision on screen in real time. In any language. With the exact rule cited. A GOAL_CONFIRMED receipt sealed in 750ms is a different regulatory posture entirely.

Football has a governance problem structurally identical to financial compliance before Basel III. Before Basel III: banks said 'we are sound.' No proof. No standard. No comparability. After Basel III: capital ratios. Measurable. Provable. Enforceable. Before gateSport: federations say 'the VAR was correct.' No proof. After gateSport: receipts. Measurable. Provable. Enforceable.

immo.quick · gateSport · VAR Forensic Decision Engine · July 2026