DEFENCE EXECUTION BOUNDARY
In defence, regulatory determination is not execution authority. A licence, clearance, valid identity or technical capability must never become Execution Permission on its own. The immo.quick Serverless Edition separates these states and resolves, before a consequence-bearing action, whether the specific Execution Right is actually closed.
Regulatory determination is not execution authority.
Defence is not a single compliance check. The sector combines specialised Determination Domains with an independent execution boundary. External Authority remains external. Rules and regulatory findings define conditions but do not create Authority. Only when the dimensions required for the concrete action - Authority, Rule, Jurisdiction, Time and Dependency - are closed can a valid Execution Right exist.
Defence governance does not stop at export control.
Procurement Authority
Procurement and award actions are resolved against the Authority, Rule, Jurisdiction, Time and Dependency state required for the concrete transaction.
Export & Re-export Authority
Licence, classification, end-use, recipient, sanctions and re-export states remain determination inputs. A licence alone is not complete Execution Permission.
Technology Transfer
Controlled technology, software, technical data and recipient context are bound to the specific transfer and its current authorization state.
Classified Information Release
Clearance, need-to-know, purpose, scope and release authority remain distinct. Clearance is not a universal Execution Right.
Supplier & Origin Governance
Origin, supplier status, sanctions findings, ownership and programme-specific conditions are maintained as versioned dependencies.
Investment & Ownership Control
FDI and change-of-control conditions may constrain Execution Rights for acquisition, participation and governance actions.
Multi-Party Approval
Multi-party and multi-eye requirements must close as collective authority sufficiency. Individual approvals do not create partial authority.
Cross-Jurisdiction Conflict
Conflicting legal contexts are preserved and surfaced. There is no silent winner and no automatically invented conflict resolution.
Autonomous & AI-enabled Actions
AI may support evidence or determination. Model confidence, tool access or agent capability must never create Authority by themselves.
Evidence & Handover Governance
Evidence is bound after the decision. Generating an evidence package does not itself authorize disclosure or handover.
Normative sources provide conditions. immo.quick does not create Authority from them.
The Defence sector can compose procurement, export-control, investment-screening, sanctions, cyber and supply-chain conditions as separate Determination Domains. Current public context includes SAFE, EDIP, EU Dual-Use Regulation 2021/821, national foreign-trade rules and US EAR/ITAR. Applicability, thresholds and legal consequences remain scope-, time- and jurisdiction-specific.
78% Non-EU · 63% USA
For the procurement period described by the European Commission, 78% was sourced outside the EU, including 63% from the United States. Cooperative procurement represented 18% in 2022.
35% Third-Country Component Rule
The 35% component rule is treated under EDIP. Common procurement measures are modelled in the documented rule context with at least three states, including at least two EU Member States.
EAR ≠ ITAR
De-minimis thresholds are treated as an EAR question and may be 10%, 25% or 0% depending on destination and rule context. The architecture does not use a generic “ITAR above 10%” rule.
AWV §§ 55 ff. / §§ 60 ff.
Investment screening is modelled through the applicable AWV review paths. Criminal-law consequences are not generalized and the system does not promise personal liability protection.
What the Defence Execution Boundary claims - and what it does not.
deterministically evaluate encoded sector conditions; bind current Authority, Rule, Jurisdiction, Time and Dependency state to a concrete action; fail closed on missing or conflicting prerequisites; cryptographically bind evidence about the evaluated state.
create governmental Authority, licences or clearances; replace substantive legal advice; prevent physical exports independently of the connected technical Execution Surface; guarantee judicial admissibility; present external auditors, authorities or regulators as endorsers or verifiers.