Language:
Home Core Serverless Edition CDS — Constitutional Screening
gateSport — VAR Engine gateMotorsport — Stewarding Engine gateAntiDoping gateTransfer
gateSocialMediaLaws gateMusicCompliance gateClinicalTrials gateRealEstateTransactions gateAgriFoodCompliance gateHeavyIndustry gateEnergyGridCompliance
gateBankingCompliance gateCBDC gateHFT gateConsortiumLoans gateTaxExecution
gateLogistics gateIntralogistics gateRailLogistics gateAviationLaws
gateEsgSocial gateSustainabilityCompliance
gateGovernmentActs gateProcurement gateBundID
Pipeline Gate 0 STFL Enforced Edge Grid CRPG Cybersecurity Data Sources System Documentation
Pricing Due Diligence Machine Law — The Book Institutions Jurisdictions Press FAQ
Quantum Security Defence 🏰 🔍 Search Request Access →
gateSocialMediaLaws — Social Media Compliance Gate
// IMMO.QUICK · GATESOCIALMEDIALAWS · DSA · COPPA

Ternary verdict, not a score. Deterministic, not estimated.

gateSocialMediaLaws checks social media and hosting platforms deterministically against the EU Digital Services Act and US COPPA, with a sealed proof per check. Support for platform compliance teams, never a replacement for them.

Request Access → See the architecture
In one sentence: gateSocialMediaLaws evaluates a submitted platform record against five independent obligations under the DSA and COPPA and seals each result individually, with exactly three possible states, pass, warn, block.
✓ RELEVANT IF...
  • You operate an online platform or hosting service with an EU nexus, regardless of size
  • You are approaching or exceeding the threshold of 45 million monthly active users in the EU
  • You process personal data of children under 13 with a US nexus
× NOT RELEVANT IF...
  • You expect a system to automatically moderate content or score users
  • Your service has no DSA or COPPA nexus at all
// The problem

Five separate obligations, often blurred into a single score.

Conventional compliance software collapses risk into a percentage or a score. But the DSA and COPPA do not deal in probability, an obligation either applies to the concrete platform state or it does not. A score blurs exactly that binary line and makes it hard to reconstruct after the fact.

// Architecture

Five sub-gates, one run.

Each sub-gate evaluates a single, independent obligation, with exactly one legal source behind it. The overall result is block as soon as one critical flag arises, otherwise warn if at least one high flag exists, otherwise pass.

GATE 1
VLOP Threshold
VLOP designation (Art. 33 DSA) without a documented risk assessment under Art. 34/35 DSA
WARN
GATE 2
Minor-Targeted Ads
Targeted advertising to minors based on profiling, Art. 28(2) DSA
BLOCK
GATE 3
Statement of Reasons
Content restriction without a clear statement of reasons to the user, Art. 17 DSA
WARN
GATE 4
Transparency Report Overdue
Periodic transparency report overdue, Art. 24, or Art. 42 DSA for VLOPs
WARN
GATE 5
COPPA
Data collection from children under 13 without verifiable parental consent, 15 U.S.C. §6502(b)
BLOCK
// Examples

Three fully fictional example decisions.

All platform names and values on this page are invented and serve only to illustrate the gate logic.

VLOP threshold without risk assessment
gateSocialMediaLaws · Gate 1
A platform with 51 million monthly active users in the EU has not filed a documented risk assessment.
monthly_active_users_eu51,000,000
vlop_risk_assessment_filedfalse
legal_basisArt. 33/34/35 DSA
DSA_VLOP_NO_RISK_ASSESSMENT
A warning, not a ban. VLOP status itself triggers a review duty, it does not ban operation. The platform keeps running, with a demonstrable reporting-gap flag.
Targeted advertising to minors
gateSocialMediaLaws · Gate 2
The same platform serves targeted advertising to minors based on profile signals.
targeted_advertising_to_minorstrue
uses_minor_profile_signalstrue
legal_basisArt. 28(2) DSA
DSA_MINOR_TARGETED_ADS_PROHIBITED
Fail-closed. A configuration with this feature is not certifiable under this check.
COPPA, missing parental consent
gateSocialMediaLaws · Gate 5
A platform with a US nexus collects personal data from children under 13 without verifiable parental consent.
us_nexus_in_scopetrue
collects_data_under_13true
verifiable_parental_consentfalse
COPPA_NO_PARENTAL_CONSENT
No intervention in operations. The gate prevents certification of this state, not the data collection itself.
// Audience

Who needs it.

Platforms of any size with an EU nexus. Without a DSA nexus, the gate returns pass immediately, no over-pruning for small providers.
VLOPs and very large search engines. From 45 million monthly active users, the risk assessment duty applies in addition.
US-nexus platforms handling children's data. COPPA only applies where an actual US nexus exists.
Hosting providers. The statement-of-reasons duty under Art. 17 DSA applies regardless of user numbers.
Compliance officers and supervisory authorities. Both receive the same, forensically reconstructible object of review.
// Clarification

What gateSocialMediaLaws is not.

  • Not a content moderation tool. The gate does not assess content substantively, it checks documented platform states against fixed legal sources.
  • Not an AI sentiment analysis or probabilistic monitoring tool. Every result is a fixed, codified value, not a probability score.
  • No certification by the European Commission or any national supervisory authority. gateSocialMediaLaws claims no official endorsement.
  • Not a replacement for the actual filing or response to the competent authority.

For platforms that want to make their DSA and COPPA practice provable.

gateSocialMediaLaws is open for conversation with platform operators, hosting providers, and regulators who want to understand how deterministic governance infrastructure translates to the DSA and COPPA.

Request Access → access@immoquick.eu
Request Access →