PUBLIC CLAIM BOUNDARIES

We publish the limit with the claim.

A public statement should never be stronger than its source, scope, time state, evidence class or authority basis. Cryptography can prove integrity and binding. Determinism can prove reproducibility under a defined state. Neither turns a technical artifact into an automatic legal conclusion.

What we do not claim.

AI creates law or institutional authority.
Cryptography proves substantive legal correctness.
Determinism means infallibility or complete external truth.
A Gate PASS creates execution permission.
A receipt guarantees admissibility, certification or legal immunity.
Hardware, cloud location or provider choice creates legitimacy.
A score, administrator or model can substitute for required authority.

What the architecture can establish.

Defined system state and its version.
Deterministic domain determinations under that state.
Whether modeled Execution Rights conditions closed.
Capability issuance and binding to the relevant authorization state.
Execution relationship, sequencing and capability consumption.
Cryptographic integrity and provenance of supported evidence artifacts.
Explicit boundaries for what each artifact does not establish.

STATE EXACTLY WHAT THE SYSTEM CAN PROVE. NEVER CLAIM WHAT ONLY A COURT, REGULATOR, INSURER OR OTHER EXTERNAL AUTHORITY CAN DECIDE.

Machine-readable Claim Manifest →Evidence Registry →Architecture →

GLOBAL REGULATORY CONVERGENCE

The world is moving toward execution.

FINMA, BaFin, the EU, NIST, NSA and U.S. government strategies are converging on continuous authorization, Zero Trust, resilience, evidence, accountability and enforceable boundaries. See source by source how immo.quick already unifies these control properties in a deterministic Execution Rights architecture — and where Machine Law goes further.

Open official comparison →How Execution Rights work →