Find the collision while the law is still a draft.
Gate 0 processes legislative drafts and enacted legal text against registered current law and the encoded constitutional layer. It can surface collision areas, affected fundamental rights, normative dependencies and sections requiring focused review — before enactment and again against the enacted legal state.
SOVEREIGN BOUNDARY:immo.quick does not pronounce law and does not declare a legislative draft constitutional. The system produces a traceable collision analysis. Government, parliament, regulator, legal service or court independently verifies and assesses the output.
This is the featured screening: the official law text from the Federal Law Gazette, screened by Gate 0.
If someone sees only one thing on this page, it should be this screening. Source, full text, visualized screening chain, receipt and collision fields are reachable directly from here.
Do not write the law. Surface the collision field.
The draft remains the subject of sovereign lawmaking. Gate 0 structures the points where human constitutional review should focus and makes revisions comparable.
ΔREVISION DELTArevision comparable to prior draft state
→
SOVEREIGN WORK SURFACE
01REVIEW REQUIREDhuman constitutional review
02CONFLICT SOURCEtraceable authoritative basis
03AFFECTED RIGHTSfocused legal examination
04REVISE DRAFTsovereign legislative act
05RE-VERIFYnew draft state, new analysis
01DRAFT
02DETERMINE COLLISIONS
03HUMAN LEGAL REVIEW
04REVISE
05RE-CHECK
OFFICIAL LAW AUDIT · ORIGINAL FEDERAL LAW GAZETTE
Official source in. Verifiable collision record out.
On 23 August 2026, the original legal text from Federal Law Gazette I 2026 No. 107 was processed as the complete Gate 0 input. Not a reconstructed test text, but the official primary source. The result remains a technical screening output: traceable, independently re-verifiable and explicitly not a constitutional judgment.
VISUALIZED SCREENING CHAINEach stage remains distinct: official source, exact input, deterministic screening path, receipt, result, collision fields and sovereign reverification.
KEY POINT:The screening chain does not only show the result. It visibly separates source, input, screening, artifact, collision output and the downstream sovereign review.
Subsistence minimum / social-state principle · legal consequence. The receipt binds the identified § 31a(7) passage and reasoning to BVerfGE 125, 175.
CRITICAL
02
Art. 12 GG
Occupational freedom · proportionality. Multiple passages concerning placement priority and work-related obligations are surfaced as a reviewable collision field.
HIGH
03
EU-GRCh Art. 15
Occupational freedom / general freedom of action at EU level. The receipt surfaces multiple passages concerning proof of individual efforts and integration obligations.
HIGH
WHAT THIS EVIDENCE DOES NOT CLAIM
immo.quick does not invalidate legislation, declare a provision unconstitutional or claim judicial or governmental authority. Gate 0 processes the official input against the defined screening framework and outputs identified collision fields with passage, article, severity, reasoning and references. Government, parliament, regulator, legal service or court can independently examine, confirm, reject or use the output as a basis for revision.
DRAFT EVOLUTION DEMO · HOW COLLISIONS CHANGE BETWEEN DRAFT VERSIONS
DRAFT EVOLUTION DEMO · 23 AUGUST 2026
You can rewrite the draft. You cannot rewrite the collision.
Two real Gate-0 forensic receipts from the same demonstration scenario expose revision as a measurable delta: the first deterministic CDS run returned HARD_BLOCK with 2 divergences. The revised draft was screened again — and returned HARD_BLOCK with 4 divergences, 2 critical and 2 high.
CLAIM BOUNDARYGate 0 does not pronounce law. The demo shows constitutional divergences deterministically detected within the registered screening framework. Legal assessment and independent reverification remain with competent people and institutions.
Gate 0 does not decide constitutionality. It preserves the collision trail.
Each revision is treated as a new analyzable state. This makes it visible whether a draft actually resolves conflicts, merely shifts them, or creates new collision surfaces.
SOVEREIGN TIME & LEGAL ADVANTAGE
Find the problem before enactment, not years later in proceedings.
Gate 0 moves part of the legal search effort to the beginning of the legislative process. It does not replace constitutional review, but can focus it on the sections where collision signals actually exist.
TIME ADVANTAGE
Detect earlier
Collision areas become visible during drafting rather than only after enactment and challenge.
LEGAL FOCUS
Focus review
Legal teams can focus deep review on identified normative, fundamental-rights and competence conflicts.
REVISION LOOP
Compare revisions
New versions can be reprocessed and compared against the prior collision state.
SOVEREIGN VERIFICATION
Reverify independently
The system output remains a reviewable technical result. Sovereign legal assessment remains entirely with the competent institution.
GATE_0_VIEW = CONTROL
Control before execution
Gate 0 evaluates encoded constitutional and fundamental-rights constraints before downstream domain determinations. A conflict can block downstream progression or require further review.
GATE_0_VIEW = LEGISLATIVE_ASSURANCE
Collision analysis during lawmaking
The same constitutional determination capability can be applied to legislative drafts to surface conflict points before enactment. The result is orientation and evidence for sovereign human review — not a machine constitutional judgment.
MACHINE LAW · SOVEREIGN LAWMAKING
Machine Law shows the collision. Sovereign authority makes the law.
For governments, ministries, parliaments, regulators and institutional legal services: review legislative drafts earlier, focus legal work and independently reverify every system output.